Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Labour Laws
06/09/20264 min read
← back
Informative
Party Who Has Not Acted Diligently Or Remained Inactive Is Not Entitled To Condonation Of Delay: NCDRC
Appeal Against OrderConsumer Protection Act
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissed an appeal against St. Stephen's Hospital due to a 213-day delay in filing, emphasizing that condonation of delay is not a right and requires sufficient reasons.
The complainants alleged medical negligence during childbirth, resulting in their child suffering brain damage. The hospital contested the claims, asserting appropriate medical care was given. The complainants cited distress and ongoing medical care for the delay.
However, the Commission noted that the explanation was inadequate, referencing precedents that require delays to be rationally explained. The Commission upheld the State Commission's order, stressing that the Consumer Protection Act mandates timely filing to ensure expeditious dispute resolution.
