Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Rajasthan High Court Refuses To Expunge Trial Court's Deleterious Remarks Against IO, Says Order Satisfies 'Triple Test'
The Rajasthan High Court recently dismissed a petition filed by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) challenging adverse remarks made by a trial court. The ASI sought to overturn the trial court's comments which were critical of its conduct in a case involving the preservation of historical monuments. The trial court had expressed concerns over the ASI's inefficiency and negligence in maintaining and protecting cultural heritage sites. The High Court upheld the trial court's decision, emphasizing that the remarks were justified given the ASI’s performance. This ruling underscores the judiciary's role in holding government bodies accountable for their duties in cultural preservation and heritage management.