Rajasthan High Court Sets Aside Bail Cancellation, Proclamation Proceedings And Action Against Surety U/S 446 CrPC In Rash Driving Case

The Rajasthan High Court set aside a trial court’s order canceling bail and declaring an accused as an absconder without proper notice. The court emphasized that bail cancellation must be preceded by a notice to the accused, allowing them to defend themselves. The trial court had also initiated proceedings against the surety under Section 446 CrPC. The High Court’s decision reinforces the importance of due process and fair hearing in bail proceedings.