Rohan Builders' Not Binding Precedent, Court Empowered To Extend Arbitrator's Mandate Even If Section 29-A Petition Filed After Termination: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court ruled that the Rohan Builders case does not set a binding precedent on the court's ability to extend an arbitrator’s mandate under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The court emphasized its authority to extend the mandate even if a petition is filed post-termination. This decision clarifies that while prior rulings may offer guidance, they do not limit the court's discretion to address procedural issues in arbitration cases, especially concerning timelines and the arbitrator's mandate.