S.27 Evidence Act | Discovery Not Vitiated Merely If Material 'Openly Accessible', Unless It Is Visible To 'Bare Eyes' Of People: Orissa High Court

The Orissa High Court ruled on the admissibility of Section 27 of the Evidence Act concerning recovery of items based on the accused's statement and openly accessible materials. It held that recovery must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and reliance on the accused's statement alone isn't sufficient without corroborative evidence. The court emphasized the need for judicial caution in such cases to avoid potential fabrication. This judgment underscores the importance of strict adherence to evidentiary standards in criminal proceedings.