Supreme Court criticizes casual practice of declaring witnesses hostile for minor inconsistencies

The Supreme Court expressed serious concern over the growing trend of trial courts declaring witnesses hostile for minor contradictions or variations in statements. The Bench observed that witnesses are human and cannot be expected to recall events with photographic accuracy after long gaps. Declaring them hostile without valid grounds weakens the prosecution case and undermines justice. The Court emphasized that only material contradictions affecting the core of the case should warrant such a declaration.

It reiterated the judiciary’s duty to protect witnesses and ensure that their testimonies are assessed with sensitivity and realism. The ruling underscores the need for judicial prudence and proper evidentiary assessment in criminal trials, discouraging mechanical practices that distort fair trial principles. This judgment reinforces witness protection and evidentiary integrity within the criminal justice system.