Deciding two connected writ petitions arising from a common Industrial Tribunal Award, the Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's direction granting hotel workmen a further…
Supreme Court's Interpretation Of 'Three Months' As 90 Days In Section 34(3) Of Arbitration Act As Obiter Dicta, Not Ratio Decidendi
The Calcutta High Court clarified that "three months" under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act equates to 90 days, aligning with Supreme Court precedent. This interpretation was non-binding (obiter dicta) in a case concerning the limitation period for challenging arbitral awards. It emphasized understanding legislative intent and the application of time limits in arbitration law.