Skip to main content
← back
Must-ReadMadhya Pradesh High Court

High Court Clarifies Open Category Seat Allocation Standards for M.P. Judicial Service Recruitment

Court / Authority

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Update / Judgement Date

15 Oct 2026

Date of Publication

16 Oct 2026

Case No.

Writ Petition No. 3750 of 2022

Source

WCP News Bulletin

Author

Pranjal Jha — WCP Legal Desk

Reading Time

3 min read

Civil Law
High Court Clarifies Open Category Seat Allocation Standards for M.P. Judicial Service Recruitment
Madhya Pradesh High Court · WCP News Bulletin
Resolving procedural dispute in M.P. Judicial Service Civil Judge examinations, High Court held that open category unreserved seats are open to all meritorious candidates regardless of category. Struck down judicial exam selection list allocating 27% OBC quota that restricted reserved category merit candidates from migrating to open category seats. (Paras 140–155)


Key Proposition: In judicial service examinations, open category seats represent unreserved merit seats where high-ranking reserved candidates must be accommodated before applying quota percentages.

  • Judicial Service Recruitment – Civil Judge Selection – Migration of Meritorious Reserved Candidates – Held, open category seats cannot be restricted to non-reserved candidates. (Para 150)
  • Procedural Law – Judicial Service Exam Rules – Allocation of 14% OBC Quota – Application of merit migration principles.


Background / Synopsis :

  • High Court Registry issued recruitment notification for Civil Judge Entry Level examination incorporating 27% OBC quota.
  • Selection process restricted meritorious reserved category candidates who scored above open category cut-offs from taking open merit seats.
  • Petitioners, judicial service aspirants, challenged the selection list rules as violating settled principles of open merit allocation.


Issues For Consideration :

  • Whether high-ranking reserved category candidates in judicial service exams are entitled to be adjusted against open unreserved merit posts.


Submissions Of Parties :

Petitioner / Appellant:

  • Open category is not a quota for general category candidates; it is an open merit category accessible to all high scorers.
  • Applying 27% OBC quota while restricting merit migration violates Indra Sawhney and RK Sabharwal principles.

Respondent / State:

  • Selection process followed judicial service examination rules as framed by High Court Administration.


Court's Observations & Analysis :

Re: Issue (i): Open Category Seat Allocation Rules

  • Meritorious reserved category candidates scoring above unreserved cut-off must be allocated open category seats.
  • OBC reservation percentage (restored to 14%) applies only after filling open merit seats.

Held: Judicial service selection list ordered to be revised by migrating top reserved candidates to open merit posts and capping OBC quota at 14%. (Para 150)


Notable Observations: "Open category is a open merit pool, not a reserved compartment for any class; restricting meritorious candidates from open seats distorts merit selection." (Para 146)


Decision & Directions :

  • High Court Registry directed to re-frame Civil Judge recruitment merit list aligning with 14% OBC quota and merit migration principles.
  • Revised selection list to be published within 30 days.


Legal Provisions Discussed & Precedents Cited :

  • M.P. Judicial Service (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994
  • Constitution of India – Article 16(4) & Article 233/234
  • R.K. Sabharwal v. State of Punjab, (1995) 2 SCC 745 – Followed
  • Saurav Yadav v. State of U.P., (2021) 4 SCC 542 – Relied on


Case Details :

  • Case / Party Name: Anju Shukla & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
  • Case Number(s): Writ Petition No. 3750 of 2022
  • Coram / Judges: Division Bench – Hon'ble Sanjeev Sachdeva, Acting Chief Justice & Hon'ble Vinay Saraf, J.
  • Counsel Appearances: Advocates for Judicial Aspirant Petitioners; Senior Counsel for High Court Registry; Government Advocate for State


Full Judgement / Attachment

Full Judgement

Frequently asked questions about Madhya Pradesh High Court

Where does the Madhya Pradesh High Court sit and which areas does it cover?
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has its principal seat at Jabalpur, with benches at Indore and Gwalior. It has jurisdiction over the State of Madhya Pradesh. It took its present form in 1956, when the State of Madhya Pradesh was reorganised.
How do I check MP High Court cases at Jabalpur, Indore or Gwalior?
The official website, mphc.gov.in, publishes bench-wise cause lists, case status and orders for the principal seat at Jabalpur and the Indore and Gwalior benches. Records are also on the eCourts High Court Services portal (hcservices.ecourts.gov.in).
What kinds of cases does the MP High Court hear?
It hears writs, civil and criminal appeals from across Madhya Pradesh, and income-tax appeals arising from the ITAT Jabalpur and Indore Benches. Cases are listed at the bench that has territorial jurisdiction over the district where they arise.
What is a Writ Appeal in the MP High Court?
Under the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaya Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, certain single-judge writ orders can be appealed to a Division Bench as a Writ Appeal. A final judgement can be taken to the Supreme Court by a Special Leave Petition under Article 136, ordinarily within 90 days.
How can White Collar Professional help with a MP High Court matter?
Post your requirement on White Collar Professional to receive proposals from verified Advocates, Chartered Accountants and Company Secretaries, compare them, and pay securely through the platform. This page also tracks the latest MP High Court judgements and legal updates as they are reported.