ITAT Bangalore Quashes Section 41(1) Addition on Long-Outstanding Group Liabilities
Court / Authority
Income Tax Tribunal
Update / Judgement Date
05 Jul 2026
Source
WCP News Bulletin
Author
Manas Yadav — WCP Legal Desk
Reading Time
2 min read

Mere Passage of Time and Search Admission Do Not Amount to Cessation of Liability
The Bangalore SMC Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has granted relief to Hassan Power Supply Company Ltd. for Assessment Year 2017–18 by deleting an addition made under Section 41(1) of the Income-tax Act in respect of long-outstanding sundry creditors. The Bench comprising Prashant Maharishi and Keshav Dubey held that unless there is a legal remission or cessation of liability, mere non-payment over time cannot trigger taxability. The Assessing Officer had treated certain stagnant balances of group companies and other payables as ceased liabilities, relying largely on the fact that they were outstanding for several years and on a statement recorded during a search under Section 132(4), where a director had agreed to offer them as income. The CIT(A) had affirmed this approach.
Subsisting Liabilities in Books Cannot Be Taxed Without Legal Extinction
Setting aside the lower authorities’ findings, the Tribunal emphasised that Section 41(1) applies only when two conditions coexist: first, there must be remission or cessation of liability in law, and second, the assessee must derive a benefit from such cessation. In the present case, the liabilities continued to be reflected in the books of accounts and were never written back or waived by creditors. Relying on settled judicial principles, the Bench observed that non-receipt of confirmations, absence of recovery action by creditors, or a search-stage admission cannot override the legal requirement of actual cessation. Since the debts subsisted and were acknowledged by the assessee, no taxable benefit arose.
Accordingly, the ITAT deleted the addition under Section 41(1) and partly allowed the assessee’s appeal, reaffirming that accounting continuity of liability defeats any presumption of remission merely due to lapse of time.
Full Judgement / Attachment
Full Judgement